Question: Is the main conflict between sharply differentiated good and evil, or is it more subtle and complex? Sharply differentiated means that it is easy to see the contrast and the characters are clearly good or evil.
“Are you warning me against somebody or someone?” I said, with a suddenly aroused interest. “That is not at all a proper question for me to answer,” said Mr. Lippincott. “I will go this far. Where large sums of money are concerned it is advisable to trust nobody” So he was warning me against someone,but he wasn’t going to give me any name”(pg.200).
The quote tells us that maybe it wasn’t a curse and someone is going after him because of what he has. This after the death of Ellie he is just picking up what his wife him because she was a wealthy woman. After reading this it made me think more about how it was all fake and someone wanted to stay with all her money. But also the women that had told Ellie about the curse was killed and was presume as an accident. But at the end, I found out that someone did want Ellie killed for all whole money but in order to do that he needed to be close. After it was all done he got rid of the witness that were part of this whole plan. The book was very interesting I like Agartha Christie books of mystery and I enjoy this book just like And then there were none. I recommend this book to those who enjoy mystery and are very good with clues.
Well, the conflict may be sharply evil and complex because a death occurs in the land which can indicate that someone did it or if the land is really cursed. Ellie the character that is was a wealthy woman that had married our main character and narrator Michael Roger. The book is giving us clues that can be discovered by paying attention and that makes me think that the conflict is complex. Now for evil, it’s pretty much common sense because a cursed land doesn’t bring good things to your life and just maybe it had to do with Ellie death.
Word: 270
Christie, Agatha. Endless Night. New York: Dodd, Mead, 1968. Print.